I thought my days discussing new branding for the Big Ten had come to an end, but alas it just keeps rolling forward. I really like the idea of branding and marketing in new and creative ways, and I have really enjoyed throwing my two cents into the ring regarding what the Big Ten is doing, since they are in the midst of a big change. With the recent news about Ohio State and Jim Tressel, it’s exciting to be able to focus on a different story.
Today I turn my attention to the Big Ten Network which released its rebranding yesterday. The redesign was an inevitability with the Big Ten expanding, the old logo had eleven stars and needed to be updated to reflect the new conference membership. This rebrand has several phases: a new logo, shortening the name to BTN, school logos, and future initiatives across multiple digital platforms.
I am not in love with the new logo. It is bigger and bolder, and includes a star which has been a part of the logo from the beginning. A positive note is how there is no mention of the number of schools in the league like in past logos.
Funky math, hidden numbers, and the name ten with twelve has been point of contention for a long time, and this prevents future logo redesign due to membership changes. The logo seems very sleek, and Big Tenny with its bold colors and old school design, but I think the Big Ten could have done something more spectacular. While the logo is made to blend with the new conference logo, it’s not as versatile as the other logo. I think it is interesting that I am contemplating the logo being flashier, when that is certainly not a Big Ten tradition, so it hits the mark on that front.
I think it is interesting they are reducing their name form Big Ten Network to BTN. While that is the common vernacular on the ESPN website and across the conference campuses, it seems like an interesting choice. I liked being able to boldly say the Big Ten Network! It definitely models ESPN and FSN featuring abbreviations for a short attention span nation. It does throw another acronym into the mix, and I have fallen head over heels for B1G, so BTN feels like a letdown.
I do like the ability to have separate school logos. This will give the logo a good amount of versatility, but again it think this lacks because I am not a super fan of the original logo design. Overall, this is one of my favorite parts of the rebrand, being able to feature the different colors and logos of each school in unique and different ways. There are so many different applications for this feature, and I am excited to see how they will be utilized!
This rebrand did not splash across the news pages like the last rebrand did, and maybe that was the ultimate goal of the Big Ten. To me this whole process seems a bit bland, but the real highlights of the network are not the
branding, but the competition on the field, and the highlights of the academic missions of the institutions involved. I am excited to see what the expansion to other media platforms will entail. The original press release highlights a big announcement next month maybe that will hold the pizzazz I am looking for. With this rebrand, the Big Ten solidly made a base hit, nothing to new and creative. Overall, with this logo, I don’t think the outcome really matters as the fans will continue to tune in to watch their teams if the logo if exciting or not.







